The Centre for Fortean Zoology was founded in the UK in 1992 - nearly 20 years ago. Over the past two decades it has expanded to become a truly global organisation. We opened our American office in 2001, our Australian office in 2009, and now - in our 19th year - we are proud to welcome CFZ Canada to the CFZ global family.

Showing posts with label Sasquatch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sasquatch. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 April 2020

My Name is Daryl

There's a very cute insurance advertisement on tv right now.  At the end of the ad, the woman is chatting with Sasquatch, and calls him "BigFoot".  He replies, "My name is Daryl" and that is a facet of the study we don't often talk about-the psychology of the beast.





If we accept that Sasquatch, or in this case Daryl, is significantly human, we have to consider that he also has emotion. Without good evidence of interaction between multiple animals, or even interaction with humans, it's hard to gage what sort of emotional capacity this big guy has. Most often, we compare him to either gorillas or humans. Both of these have the capacity to feel and express emotion.

Given those things, what can we infer about Sasquatch? Gorillas in the wild have been well



documented to show affection. Dian Fossey’s work in the field, along with Jane Goodall who studied chimpanzees, and BirutÄ— Galdikas, who studied orangutans, not only document habits like food gathering or confrontation. All three extensively documented the interactions between the animals, and often the interaction between the researchers and the subjects.

In 1959, American zoologist George Schaller carried out a yearlong pioneering study of the mountain gorilla. In the field at Mt Mikeno in Congo. Recognized by many as the world's preeminent field biologist, he studied and lived with the mountain gorillas of the Virunga Volcanoes along the northern edge of Rowanda. It wasn't until the publication of The Mountain Gorilla: Ecology and Behavior in 1963, that the general public was introduced to how profoundly intelligent and gentle gorillas really are. Until then most believed they were considered not only dangerous when provoked, but dangerous all of the time in interactions with all species.

Shaller and Fossey were not the only field researchers to admire (and to provide valid, important information), but they are excellent resources for understanding the emotional side to gorillas. These creatures have individual personalities and rich social lives. Gorillas communicate through at least 22 distinct sounds, and a variety of other ways, including facial expressions, sounds, postures and gestures. They communicate feelings from playful laughter to frightened screams. They even belches in contented bliss after a particularly good meal.

In gorilla families, there is a distinct pair of parents and up to about 28 other individuals of both sexes. Like humans, they show loyalty, compassion, and protection of those who are younger or injured or in some other way not fully functional at an healthy adult level. Also like humans, gorillas often greet each other by touching their noses together. They are also known to give a reassuring embrace. Their reaction to challenge from other adults is also similar to human, although more guttural. It's not unusual for a dominant male gorilla to fight to the death to protect his family, but it is also common for the dominant male to kill the children in his family to get the attention and reproductive needs met.

We are most familiar with human emotion, of course. This is largely because we have them, and we can be empathetic with others of our species. While we usually don't kill our children out of jealousy, we do often have the emotion behind it. We also easily see those among us that have personality "flaws" like addiction or psychosis. Similarities between the emotional development of the bonobos and that of human children suggest that great apes regulate their emotions in a human-like way. Research by Zanna Clay, PhD, and Frans de Waal, PhD, showed that bonobos recovered quickly and easily from their own emotional upheavals. Clay notes that bonobos more often gave body comfort (kissing, embracing, touching) to those in distress. They show hints at emotion regulation, such as the ability to temper strong emotions and avoid over-arousal. In some cases, they do this better than humans.

If we accept that Sasquatch is a composition of the evolution of apes and humans, it follows that Sasquatch, like Daryl, would have these emotions. Field research has shown that they are definitely curious. Reports of the animal visiting campsites and going through the items there, as well as reports of them standing in the distance or some sheltered space and observing human researchers are common. Humans have a fascination with the divide between their species and animals, so it follows that bigfoot would be equally fascinated with the similarities and differences between their species and humans.




No documentation exists of how Sasquatch feels about us, or even about others of the same species. It is logical to assume they have families, with times that are both loving and challenging. All animals show fear in some way. But what about the more complicated emotions like grief and a sense of humor? Dr Gary Stanley's work with Koko (the gorilla who could communicate with American Sign Language) has given us insight. Koko's trainer and long-term companion, Penny Patterson, thought Koko signed in novel ways and showed complex emotions. Patterson documented that when a cat that Koko loved was killed in an accident, Koko signed: “Cat, cry, have-sorry, Koko-love.” Linguists and experts in sign languages disagreed with some of Patterson's conclusions. Sign language has complex grammars, like spoken tongues in expressiveness. Koko’s ability fell short of a fluent human signer, and Ms Patterson was Koko's interpreter. This invited the question of how much she was inferring what Koko “must have meant”.

Despite the disagreements between researchers, it is abundantly clear that gorillas and humans both have extensive emotional capacity. It follows, then, that sasquatch would have this as well. In fiction, like "Harry and the Hendersons" and the more recent " Missing Link" it is clear how much the missing "stars" connect and express feelings. In the similar "Smallfoot" offering, the roles are reversed. The sasquatch in that film sees humans as mythical creatures in the yetis’ imaginations. Across the board, the "beasts" are shown to have not only empathy, but also the ability to feel lonely. This may not be too far from reality. Given the relatively small number of living sasquatch, it is reasonable to imagine feelings of loneliness, and even fear that the loneliness will not end.  Perhaps if we consider this as we do our fieldwork, it will bring us closer not only to answers, but also to a connection with the beast.




More Reading:
https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/the-gorilla-king-gorilla-family-dynamics/735/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dian_Fossey
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3374268-the-mountain-gorilla
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Schaller#Mountain_gorilla_research
httphttps://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/06/21/bigfoot.psychology.monsters/index.htmls://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131014155739.htm
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/2609440/Mother-gorillas-grief-shows-emotion-is-not-only-human.html
https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/just-in/2018-10-26/so-why-do-people-believe-bigfoot-anyway
https://www.koko.org/research-care/730/are-gorillas-emotionally-aware/
https://www.filemaker.com/solutions/customers/stories/the-gorilla-foundation.html
https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2018/07/05/what-koko-the-gorilla-could-and-couldnt-do
https://www.washingtonpost.com/goingoutguide/movies/missing-link-is-a-visually-stunning-story-about-a-lonely-bigfoot-but-its-missing-something/2019/04/09/29984f3c-5108-11e9-88a1-ed346f0ec94f_story.html?arc404=true
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2018/06/21/koko-the-beloved-gorilla-that-learned-to-communicate-using-sign-language-has-died/




Saturday, 25 January 2020

How Would You See This?

There doesn't seem to be much happening in Canada these days, so have a look at the latest from Washington State, about 100km from the border.  In a tweet, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) released photos of a shadowy figure that resemblance Sasquatch.


Sasquatch spotted!!! I'm not superstitious... just a little stitious. Have you noticed something strange on our Sherman Pass/SR 20 webcam before? If you look closely by the tree on the left there looks to be something... might be Sasquatch... We will leave that up to you! pic.twitter.com/RaDGqQdEUF
 — WSDOT East (@WSDOT_East) January 22, 2020

In this still image, taken by webcam , the so-called Sasquatch appears to be mid-stride walking on Sherman Pass, into the forest of the Pacific Northwest.  The area is a hotspot for sightings.  





I have to wonder how this relatively ambiguous black figure was spotted.  Is there someone assigned to watching the cameras for Bigfoot?  Here's a cropped close up of the figure.




I don't find this photo particularly conclusive.  This could be a lot of things.  It would have been much more interesting if someone had made the effort to go check the spot for tracks/footprints.

The Kelowna Now Facebook page discussion of this even has garnered over 560 comments.  Most were just tagging friends to show them the article or something funny but respectful.  The western provinces of Canada generally embrace Sasquatch, whether real or myth. One of the posters puts it well:

Laurie Smitty Smith I believe they are out there...but this ...skeptical


More Reading
https://www.kelownanow.com/watercooler/news/news/Around_the_Web/Sasquatch_spotted_Highway_webcam_appears_to_capture_elusive_Bigfoot/
https://www.facebook.com/pg/KelownaNow/posts/?ref=page_internal

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

New Sasquatch Video

Gino Meekis, a hunter who lives near Sioux Lookout in Northern Ontario, recorded a video on his phone on Oct. 3 while he was out hunting grouse with his wife and grandson.  They were hunting about 45 kilometres away from the town.  Sioux Lookout is in northwestern Ontario,  about halfway between Thunder Bay, and Winnipeg, Manitoba.

The area would certainly be prime real estate for the creature.   With a population of about 5600, it covers just over 530 square kilometers.  About a third of the area is water, and the other unpopulated surroundings are forest and the rugged Canadian Shield.  Over 5,000 years ago the land was Ojibway territory and the name comes from the native use as a vantage point where guards could see canoes approaching.  The Sioux lived in the Western Plains and legend has it that the Ojibway endured many years of surprise attacks by the Sioux when they came to trade.  Eventually, the Ojibway ambushed the Sioux  at a peak of land near Pelican Lake.  And the name "Sioux Lookout" was born.   

‘We walked down a trail to see if we can find a bird, and on our way back to the vehicle, it started. When it let out the first scream, I thought it was a moose, but my mind changed when it screamed again and again,” Meekis said in an interview with Vice Media.

Meekis said the sound resembled a loud, echoing howl.  he claims it continued for about five minutes.  During that time he captured two videos and in one, his grandson is heard howling back at the sound.
An officer for Ontario’s Ministry of Resources and Forestry was contacted by Vice Media.  She said her team couldn’t  pinpoint the source of the sound.   “Our biologists say it could be a larger mammal–for example a wolf–but because it’s a considerable distance from the recorder there is no way to know for sure,” Jolanta Kowalski said.
There are two types of wolves in Ontario.  The Eastern Wolf, also known as the Algonquin Wolf,   is listed as Threatened as of 2016.  There are an estimated 500 of these wolves, generally in remote central Ontario and western Quebec.  They weigh about 30kg and have an overall reddish coat.  Hunters are allowed to kill coyotes and other animals like Great Lakes-Boreal wolves, Eastern coyotes and hybrids that look virtually identical to Algonquin wolves.  The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry doesn’t require DNA tests to be done and doesn't know how many wolves are being killed.

A more populous wolf is the Gray Wolf.   With about 9600 in Ontario and 50-60,000 in Canada, they are not considered at risk.  Gray Wolves share some Eastern Wolf DNA as well.  They can weigh up to 890kg and could be black, white, or grey.
Wolves communicate in many ways.  They whimper, bark, howl, and yip, but it's the howling that most people hear.  Wolves have excellent hearing and can hear sounds as much as 10km away in forested areas and further in the open tundra.  They howl to bring help to other wolves, warn of their presence, and when in pain.  Wolves have been known to respond to human imitations, even from 4 km away.
‘We walked down a trail to see if we can find a bird, and on our way back to the vehicle, it started,” Meekis said in an interview. “When it let out the first scream, I thought it was a moose, but my mind changed when it screamed again and again.”
Is this what Meekis and his family heard?  He doesn't think so.  “I’ve heard many different animals in the wild but nothing like this. I grew up hunting with my grandfather for the first 12 years of my life,” Meekis said.





Meekis explained that his family retreated to their vehicle when the tone and rhythm of the  howling increased.

In Alert Bay, British Columbia  sounds that are similar were recorded in 2015.  According to CTV News (video below).  Local residents suggested that the noises came from a sasquatch.  The island where the howls were heard doesn’t house any large mammals.




Whether it was a Sasquatch or not, Meekis and his family encountered something frightening in the remote forests of Ontario.  And the video has gone viral.

More Reading:

Thursday, 10 October 2019

Don't Kill Our Sasquatch

From Wikipedia
British Columbia is known to be a little...odd.  Generally, it has little to do with anything para-, super-, whatever-normal.  One thing most found odd was that killing a Sasquatch, said to be plentiful in the province, is illegal.  This law made researchers and believers quite happy.

In BC, there are some outdated laws, and some that are now, thankfully, gone.  In Vancouver you couldn't sell a stove on a Wednesday.  In Esquimalt snowball throwing within city limits was prohibited.

Other unusual laws reportedly prevail.  It's illegal to own more than 4 pet rats at a time in Port Coquitlam, for instance.  You also have to keep your cows off the street.  In Oak Bay you could be fined $100 if you parrot talks to loud.   Be careful too; you can be fined if your avian friend gets loose and flies into someone else's home.   In Victoria, street entertainers aren't allowed to give kids balloon animals.  It seems BC has a thing about animals and pets.


The reality, however, is that Sasquatch are not specifically protected from being killed.  Turns out, this is an urban legend.  There doesn’t appear to be any official statement but, the laws of British Columbia do declare that wildlife is owned by the government and can’t be hunted without a specific license. 

The myth probably originated in Nanaimo at the turn of the 20th century.  The Best of Sasquatch Bigfoot by John Green  quotes a letter where the writer is asking the Government Agent at the time (Marshall Bray) for permission to shoot the "wild man of Horne Lake".  The Agent  informed Kincaid that" it is unlawful to shoot Mowglies within the province of British Columbia at any time."  Marshall Bray also served as gold commissioner, Assistant Commissioner of Lands and Works for the district, police magistrate, and registrar of births, deaths and marriages for the Courts. He was also a director of the Nanaimo Telephone Company. The  BC Archives have collected materials on Marshall Bray if you'd like more information on him.

The neighbors to the south, however, do have a law specifically about killing Sasquatch.  On April 1, 1969 the Board of Commissioners of Skamania County, Washington, adopted an ordinance for the protection of sasquatch/bigfoot.  The ordinance has been partially repealed and amended and the revised ordinance went into effect on April 2, 1984.  It also declared the animal "an endangered species" and created a "Sasquatch Refuge".  

Back in Canada, the B.C. Supreme Court ruled on the case of Standing v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resources).  Filmmaker Todd Standing, 
 claimed that the B.C. government was infringing on his Charter rights in ignoring his claims that he had seen the creature, and added that the ministry specifically was failing citizens by failing to protect the sasquatch.    He also sought a government statement that “Sasquatch is a hominoid or primate (Giganto Horridus Hominoid and/or Gigantopithecus) type of species, also known as a bigfoot, and is an indigenous mammal living within British Columbia” .  If he won, this would be a groundbreaker for serious researchers.

Justice Kenneth Ball delivered his ruling after seventeen days of consideration.  He sided with the government in a ruling reminiscent of a case against big tobacco. Justice Ball said courts should not be a body that decides “alleged scientific facts which are not universally accepted as true”... “The facts pleaded by the plaintiff disclose no infringement of any legal rights. Mr. Standing lost his case.  He had refused to disclose specific locations where Sasquatch had been sighted, claiming it would endanger the species.  It is suspected that this was an attempt to get the court to legitimize the study of the creature, basically claiming they exist.


Sadly, until and unless we can prove that Bigfoot is in some part human, it is still legal to kill one in many places.  According to an official with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission for example, Bigfoot isn't listed as an endangered species, so you're free to kill as many as you want.  Agency representative David Sinclair, 


"A nonprotected nongame animal may be hunted on private property with landowner consent by any means, at any time and there is no bag limit or possession limit."

If you do kill one, which no serious researcher recommends, be absolutely certain it does not contain any human DNA.  That's a murder charge.





  
More Reading:
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/dumb-laws-bc
https://www.narcity.com/ca/bc/vancouver/lifestyle/36-strange-laws-you-didnt-know-existed-in-canada
https://www.bcmag.ca/10-bizarre-british-columbia-laws/
https://www.courthouselibrary.ca/how-we-can-help/our-legal-knowledge-base/sasquatch-bc-law
https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/what-british-columbias-supreme-court-said-about-sasquatch/
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/18/14/2018BCSC1499.htm
https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/10-surprising-city-animal-laws-heres-where-bigfoot-cant-be-shot.html/
https://www.livescience.com/20248-shooting-bigfoot-legal-texas.html
https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2019/07/killing-sasquatch-the-debate-between-law-science-and-conservation/
https://www.wbko.com/content/news/A-shooting-at-mammoth-cave-over-an-alleged-bigfoot-sighting--513405181.html



Wednesday, 4 September 2019

Follow Your Arrow

Recently, in Sturgis, Saskatchewan, they held an archery competition. After a hearty pancake breakfast, archers had the opportunity to walk two courses of about 2km each. Twenty 3-D targets, were set up in realistic natural settings. These included bear, turkey, wild boars, panther, cougars, elk, deer, moose, antelope, buffalo, dinosaurs, an alligator. and this year, a life sized 3-D Bigfoot. After first thoughts of the elusive hairy best being just as rare in that area as alligators and dinosaurs, it felt prudent to research to confirm or disprove the scarcity theory.

In 1895, a rancher named Jack Shewfelt moved his operation to the elbow of the river in what was then known as the Assiniboine Territory. The discover of arrowheads and other evidence proves that the present site had long been a place of nomadic Indian tribes. In 1901 Owen Carragher bought Shewfelt's buildings and became the earliest settler. In 1902 townships 33 and 34 were surveyed and this brought an influx of homesteaders. The years 1904-1906 saw many homesteaders from the United States, Ontario, the Maritimes, England, Sweden, Poland and the Ukraine. Soon, a railway line from Swan River, Manitoba to Pelly, Saskatchewan and in 1911, it reached Sturgis and continued to Preeceville (about 115kilometers) . In 1914, the line was expanded from Canora to Sturgis.

Fred C. Brooks moved his general store from Crystal Lake to the Sturgis area and became the first Postmaster. He gave it the name Sturgis Post Office, after his hometown of Sturgis, South Dakota. There seems to be some evidence that the town was at one time known as Stanhope.  Sturgis was incorporated as a village in 1912. Several of its residents lived to be over 100 years old.

Currently, there are about 650 residents. Sturgis occupies a total land area of about 3.5 square kilometers and has a median resident age of 50. It's home to five churches. You could buy a two bedroom house there for under $100,00 (which currently translates to about $67,000 US Dollars).

Reports of Sasquatch in the area come from experiences in the 60s and in the 80s. 
A young woman was playing in a field, where there an abandoned shack in the distance. When she looked up, what she says was Bigfoot was laying in the grass. It was startled and got up and walked away. Many years later, her daughter also spotted the hairy guy in a park near the same area. Another local claims to have a video of a Sasquatch crossing a small river or creek, and climbing up the riverbank.

This area is considered to be southern Saskatchewan. There are some hills and valleys, but is mostly open field with limited wooded areas. It surely isn't prime Sasquatch habitat, from what we conjecture his needs would be. It is sparsely populated, but so is northern Saskatchewan where there is considerably more more tree cover. There are, however, many lakes, and the wilderness of the Porcupine Forest, just to the north of town, offers big game trophy hunting and fishing opportunities.





There may be a good reason to look at this area as Sasquatch populated. Much more fieldwork needs to be done there. If you don't find a 'Squatch, at least you can have a look at the Cowboy and the Park Patrol roadside attractions. They are just as odd. And no, the province name does not in any way related to the term Sasquatch. But they do have them.






More Reading:

https://www.preecevilleprogress.com/news/local-news/archers-enjoy-3-d-archery-shoot-at-sturgis-sportsgrounds-1.23930220
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgis,_Saskatchewan
https://www.reddit.com/r/bigfoot/comments/8nk3hq/a_couple_stories_about_sasquatch_in_the_canadian/
https://gh.smitop.com/roadsides/alphabet.html
https://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/americas/saskatchewan-sasquatch-irpt/index.html
https://www.mysteriesofcanada.com/bc/sasquatch-history-bigfoot/





Wednesday, 17 July 2019

Grover Krantz


This is who I think of when I see the name Grover, but our Grover Krantz wasn't blue.  Grover the Muppet is described as lovable, cute and furry and provides educational context for simple, everyday things.  Maybe they weren't so different overall.


Grover Sanders Krantz (November 5, 1931 – February 14, 2002) was an anthropologist and cryptozoologist.  With over 10 books and 60 academic articles in his portfolio he is also remembered as a prolific writer. His cryptozoological research on Bigfoot was heavily criticized by colleagues, which in turn cost him funding for more research and even his tenure at the university where he taught.  His work was considered "fringe science" and often that attitude carried over to his academic work.  


Krantz is known for his unapologetic belief in the existence of Big Foot.  His articles were rejected by scholarly journals, but he persisted.  He has been described as having been the "only scientist" and "lone professional" to seriously consider Bigfoot in his time, as most bigfoot researchers were amateur naturalists. For the most part, we still are.


Born in Salt Lake City in 1931 hr tried to follow the basic Christian philosophy of behaviour and morality but never really embraced his parents Mormon Church.Krantz served in the Air National Guard as a desert survival instructor in 1951-52 before completing his Bachelor of Science and Master's at University of California, Berkeley in 1958.  His dissertation, The Origins of Man, earned him his Doctorate from the University of Minnesota in 1971.  He eventually became a popular professor at Washington State University even though he had a reputation for giving really difficult exams.  He took a personal interest in his students, often having lunch with them and talking about anthropology, current events, and various sciences.  Krantz retired in 1998 and after his death there was a scholarship named after him to "promote interest in the fields of physical/biological anthropology, linguistic archaeology, and/or human demography."


"I've been a teacher all my life, and I think I might as well be a teacher after I'm dead."
Krantz's studies of Bigfoot, which he called "Sasquatch," led him to theorize that sightings were due to small pockets of surviving gigantopithecines, having migrated across the Bering land bridge, which was later used by humans to enter North America. It is thought to have gone extinct 100,000 years ago in eastern Asia. In January 1985 Krantz tried to formally name Bigfoot at the meeting of the International Society of Cryptozoology held in Sussex, England, assigning it the name Gigantopithecus blacki. This was not permitted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature because G. blacki was an existing name and the creature was lacking a holotype. Krantz argued that his plaster casts were suitable holotypes then later suggesting G. canadensis as a name. He got no support.Krantz was skeptical about the Patterson–Gimlin film. He believed it was a hoax. He then studied the gait of the Sasquatch and came to believe the film was authentic. After years of skepticism, Krantz finally became convinced of Bigfoot's existence after analyzing the "Cripplefoot" plaster casts gathered at Bossburg, Washington. Shortly before his death, Krantz also examined the Skookum cast but did not publicly endorse its authenticity. He said, "I don't know what it is. I'm baffled. Elk. Sasquatch. That's the choice."

Grover Krantz had one brother, Victor Krantz, who worked as a photographer at the Smithsonian Institution. His other brother, Eugene, headed the government affairs office of postage meter giant Pitney Bowes Inc. for 19 years until his retirement in 1982. Grover Krantz was married four times and divorced three times. He also had a stepson, Dural Horton. Krantz was a travel enthusiast. He frequently took road trips, traveling to all 48 continental US states. He did fieldwork in Europe, China, and Java as well as his home state of Washington and other North American locations.

“It has not yet been established that the Sasquatch exists,” To pass laws against harming sasquatches presently makes little more sense than protecting unicorns.”
The remains of Dr. Krantz, per his request, were taken to the University of Tennessee's Anthropology Research Facility.  Scientists there conducted many kinds of skeletal research, including studies that are essential in forensic cases for accurately estimating time since death.  In 2003, the remains and three of his dogs were brought to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, where their skeletons could be used in teaching.

In the 1970s, Krantz studied the fossil remains of Ramapithecus.  Many anthropologists thought it to be ancestral to humans, but Kranta helped prove this notion false.  He showed differences in phonemic speech, theoretical hunting patterns and anatomical differences between homo erectus and modern humans then wrote an influential paper on humans in prehistoric Europe.  He was the first researcher to explain the mastoid process.


Krantz was drawn into the Kennewick Man controversy in 1996.  He argued in academia and in court that there was no good evidence of direct lineage to extant human populations.
He stated his view that "this skeleton cannot be racially or culturally associated with any existing American Indian group" and "the Native Repatriation Act [sic] has no more applicability to this skeleton than it would if an early Chinese expedition had left one of its members there."

He attempted to submit the last paper he wrote before his death, titled "Neanderthal Continuity in View of Some Overlooked Data," but it was rejected by the peer-reviewed journal Current Anthropology.  The editor stated it did not make enough reference to the most current research.  Whether consciously or not, his anger over the years of academic abuse was apparent in this article.  He was told that the tone was "jarring and unacademic" and was refused a second time after a rewrite.  He decided his career was indeed over.  Just before his death from pancreatic cancer, his friend and colleague Jon Bodly visited him and attempted to find the "foolproof method of determining a fake track from a real one just by looking at them."  Krantz just smiled and refused to answer, dying the next day with his secret intact.



Krantz’s plan to kill a Bigfoot “was a political hot potato,”  Jeffrey Meldrum. “It divided the Bigfoot community right down the middle with strong feelings on both sides.”  If Krantz were to shoot one, he might be helping to kill off the species for the sake of his own research but  Krantz’s point was that no one would bother to preserve the species until it was recognized by science.  He felt the only way to get that recognition was  to bring in a corpse.

Though Krantz never found a Bigfoot dead or alive, he had what he thought were close calls.  Krantz was also seen as a maverick in his research methods.  Many found him funny and entertaining. One year, Krantz molded a set of heavy brow ridges and strapped them to his head. He let his hair grow out all summer, trying to ascertain the advantage of a hominid’s having such ridges.  According to Meldrum, “He came to the conclusion that it kept the hair out of your eyes."

Although eccentric, he was also a respected scholar who made legitimate contributions to science.  He was a member of both MENSA and INTERTEL, but fell prey to hoaxes.  After graduating, Donald Tyler and another professor made a fake Sasquatch cast and took it to Krantz for analysis. They used their fingers and foreheads to create lines in the bottom of the cast.  Krantz determined, based on specific dermal ridges and lines in the foot, that the cast was without a doubt from the Blue Mountains.  Krantz was undeterred.  Because footprints have been found for so many decades in so many different places in the world, it seemed completely implausible to Krantz that every one of them could have been faked.  I tend to agree.
More Reading:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Krantz
https://anthro.wsu.edu/scholarships/
https://naturalhistory.si.edu/education/teaching-resources/written-bone/forensic-anthropology/skeletal-research-collections
https://books.google.ca/books?id=5a7GAAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Neanderthal+Continuity+in+View+of+Some+Overlooked+Data%22++Krantz&source=gbs_navlinks_s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover
https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/69594756712516365/?lp=true
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/over-9000-years-later-kennewick-man-will-be-given-native-american-burial-180958947/
http://www.northamericanbigfoot.com/2011/04/sasquatch-summit-looking-back-at.html
https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/summer-2018-our-town/man-myth-and-legend-grover-krantz
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1998/06/20/eugene-krantz-pitney-bowes-executive-dies/dfb930e1-5160-409f-b34c-a97ae71360f8/?utm_term=.76133a9251b5